QEEG: State of the Art, or State of Confusion

Authors

  • David A. Kaiser

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1300/J184v04n02_07

Abstract

Recent advances in technology have resulted in a proliferation of quantitative EEG applications. The availability of few formal methodological standards threatens to transform this computational and technical freedom into a permanent source of confusion and incompatibility. Common methodological and analytical parameters of topographic EEG research are reviewed, with the goal of eventual formalization of methodological procedures for the field.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-14

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2000)

Section

SPECIAL TOPICS

License

© International Society for Neurofeedback and Research (ISNR), all rights reserved. This article (the “Article”) may be accessed online from ISNR at no charge. The Article may be viewed online, stored in electronic or physical form, or archived for research, teaching, and private study purposes. The Article may be archived in public libraries or university libraries at the direction of said public library or university library. Any other reproduction of the Article for redistribution, sale, resale, loan, sublicensing, systematic supply, or other distribution, including both physical and electronic reproduction for such purposes, is expressly forbidden. Preparing or reproducing derivative works of this article is expressly forbidden. ISNR makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any content in the Article.  From 1995 to 2013 the Journal of Neurotherapy was the official publication of ISNR (www. Isnr.org); on April 27, 2016 ISNR acquired the journal from Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. In 2014, ISNR established its official open-access journal NeuroRegulation (ISSN: 2373-0587; www.neuroregulation.org).